Vancouver call for action to strengthen expertise in radiological protection worldwide.

Ionising radiation has been used for over a century for peaceful purposes, revolutionising health care and promoting well-being through its application in industry, science, and medicine. For almost as long, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) has promoted understanding of health and environmental risks of ionising radiation and developed a protection system that enables the safe use of ionising radiation in justified and beneficial practices, providing protection from all sources of radiation. However, we are concerned that a shortage of investment in training, education, research, and infrastructure seen in many sectors and countries may compromise society's ability to properly manage radiation risks, leading to unjustified exposure to or unwarranted fear of radiation, impacting the physical, mental, and social well-being of our peoples. This could unduly limit the potential for research and development in new radiation technologies (healthcare, energy, and the environment) for beneficial purposes. ICRP therefore calls for action to strengthen expertise in radiological protection worldwide through: (1) National governments and funding agencies strengthening resources for radiological protection research allocated by governments and international organisations, (2) National research laboratories and other institutions launching and sustaining long-term research programmes, (3) Universities developing undergraduate and graduate university programmes and making students aware of job opportunities in radiation-related fields, (4) Using plain language when interacting with the public and decision makers about radiological protection, and (5) Fostering general awareness of proper uses of radiation and radiological protection through education and training of information multipliers. The draft call was discussed with international organisations in formal relations with ICRP in October 2022 at the European Radiation Protection Week in Estoril, Portugal, and the final call announced at the 6th International Symposium on the System of Radiological Protection of ICRP in November 2022 in Vancouver, Canada.

Keeping the ICRP recommendations fit for purpose.

The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) has embarked on a review and revision of the system of Radiological Protection that will update the 2007 general recommendations in ICRPPublication 103. This is the beginning of a process that will take several years, involving open and transparent engagement with organisations and individuals around the world. While the system is robust and has performed well, it must adapt to address changes in science and society to remain fit for purpose. The aim of this paper is to encourage discussions on which areas of the system might gain the greatest benefit from review, and to initiate collaborative efforts. Increased clarity and consistency are high priorities. The better the system is understood, the more effectively it can be applied, resulting in improved protection and increased harmonisation. Many areas are identified for potential review including: classification of effects, with particular focus on tissue reactions; reformulation of detriment, potentially including non-cancer diseases; re-evaluation of the relationship between detriment and effective dose, and the possibility of defining detriments for males and females of different ages; individual variation in the response to radiation exposure; heritable effects; and effects and risks in non-human biota and ecosystems. Some of the basic concepts are also being considered, including the framework for bringing together protection of people and the environment, incremental improvements to the fundamental principles of justification and optimisation, a broader approach to protection of individuals, and clarification of the exposure situations introduced in 2007. In addition, ICRP is considering identifying where explicit incorporation of the ethical basis of the system would be beneficial, how to better reflect the importance of communications and stakeholder involvement, and further advice on education and training. ICRP invites responses on these and other areas relating to the review of the System of Radiological Protection.

Australia's proactive approach to radiation protection of the environment: how integrated is it with radiation protection of humans?

Australia's regulatory framework has evolved over the past decade from the assumption that protection of humans implies protection of the environment to the situation now where radiological impacts on non-human species (wildlife) are considered in their own right. In an Australian context, there was a recognised need for specific national guidance on protection of non-human species, for which the uranium mining industry provides the major backdrop. National guidance supported by publications of the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (Radiation Protection Series) provides clear and consistent advice to operators and regulators on protection of non-human species, including advice on specific assessment methods and models, and how these might be applied in an Australian context. These approaches and the supporting assessment tools provide a mechanism for industry to assess and demonstrate compliance with the environmental protection objectives of relevant legislation, and to meet stakeholder expectations that radiological protection of the environment is taken into consideration in accordance with international best practice. Experiences from the past 5-10 years, and examples of where the approach to radiation protection of the environment has been well integrated or presented some challenges will be discussed. Future challenges in addressing protection of the environment in existing exposure situations will also be discussed.

Protection of the environment in existing exposure situations.

The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) described its approach to the protection of the environment and how it should be applied in Publication 124 The report expanded on the Commission's objectives for environmental protection, and how the Derived Consideration Reference Levels (DCRLs) apply within different exposure situations. DCRLs relate radiation effects to doses over and above their normal local background radiation levels, and consider different potential pathways of exposure for animals and plants. This paper will describe how the DCRLs may be used within existing exposure situations to better understand the potential impacts on animals and plants. In these circumstances, the Commission recommends that the aim be to reduce exposures to levels that are within the DCRL bands (or even below, depending upon the potential cost/benefits), but with full consideration of the radiological and non-radiological consequences of doing so. Using examples, this paper will demonstrate how this may be achieved in practice, bearing in mind the potential exposure of humans, animals and plants during and following any remediation attempted.

Overview of ICRP Committee 5: protection of the environment.

Protection of the environment is integral to the system of radiological protection, as outlined in the 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP, Publication 103). The Commission's activities in this area are mainly pursued by Committee 5 and its associated Task Groups. Publication 91 broadly outlines the approach to radiological protection of the environment, and its alignment with approaches to environmental protection from hazardous substances in general. Publications 108 and 114 provide the cornerstones of the environmental protection system and relevant databases. Publication 124 considers its application in planned, existing, and emergency exposure situations. The system centres on 12 Reference Animals and Plants (RAPs) with broad relevance for environmental protection based on their ubiquity and significance as well as other criteria, as described in Publication 108 The databases comprise general biology of the RAPs, transfer parameters, dose conversion coefficients, and effects data. Derived Consideration Reference Levels (DCRLs) were established for each RAP; a DCRL represents a band of dose rates that might result in some deleterious effects in individuals of that type of RAP. Newly established Task Group 99 will compile the RAP-specific reference information into monographs, with the view of updating information and improving the applicability of the system in different exposure situations. For certain scenarios, more precise and ecosystem-specific protection benchmarks may be justified, which would have to be informed by consideration of representative organisms (i.e. representative of a particular ecosystem and relevant to the specific scenario; Publication 124). Committee 5 will explore this further, making use of a limited number of case studies.

Overview of ICRP Committee 5.

The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) established Committee 5 in 2005 in response to the need to provide direct demonstration of environmental protection from radiation in accordance with national law and international agreements. The development of the ICRP system for environmental protection was facilitated by research over the previous decades, as well as by ICRP's evaluation of the ethical and philosophical basis for environmental protection as laid out in ICRP Publication 91. The 2007 Recommendations (Publication 103) incorporated environmental protection as one of the integral elements of the radiation protection system. Over a relatively short time, the system has evolved to incorporate a set of 12 Reference Animals and Plants (RAPs), which is a small enough number to develop comprehensive databases for each RAP, but wide ranging enough to provide some insight into radiation impact and protection against such impact, as appropriate, in terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems. As necessary, the databases can be used to derive supplementary databases for Representative Organisms typical for a particular exposure situation of concern or under study. The system, to date, details biology of the RAPs (Publication 108); outlines transfer factors for estimation of internal concentrations of radionuclides of environmental significance under different situations (Publication 114); provides further information (Publication 108) on dosimetry, biological effects, and derived consideration reference levels (bands of environmental dose rates where potential detrimental effects may deserve attention); and provides information on application of the system in planned, emergency, and existing exposure situations (Publication 124). Currently, a review of experimental determinations of relative biological effectiveness, to guide derivation of specific weighting factors for use in environmental radiation protection if possible and necessary, is being concluded, as is work on improved dosimetry. Further work in this area involves consolidation of databases, recommendations for derivation of specific databases for Representative Organisms on the basis of the RAP data, and recommendations for application of the system to environmental protection in relation to certain human activities of potential environmental concern. Consideration needs to be made for the wider range of ecosystem effects that may be covered in ecological risk assessments, which incorporate the complete suite of stressors that result from human activity, and their effects, to understand the role of radiation effects in this context.

ICRP's approach to protection of the living environment under different exposure situations.

The International Commission on Radiological Protection's (ICRP) system to protect the living components of the environment is designed to provide a broad and practical framework across all exposure situations. The objectives of ICRP are therefore also set in fairly broad terms, recognising that national and local environmental protection requirements may need to be set within them. The framework recognises the need to be able to demonstrate an adequate level of protection in relation to planned exposure situations, whilst also providing an ability to manage existing situations and accidents, as well as emergency situations, in a rational way. The objects of protection are always real biota in real exposure situations, and the scientific basis for their protection needs to be based on data originating from studies on the relationships between exposure and dose, dose and effects, and effects and consequences in real animals and plants. The framework that has been developed has therefore had to take such realities into account to make the optimum use of the data currently available, whilst being sufficiently flexible to accommodate new scientific information as it arises without having to alter the framework as a whole.

ICRP Publication 124: Protection of the Environment under Different Exposure Situations.

In this report, the Commission describes its framework for protection of the environment and how it should be applied within the Commission's system of protection. The report expands upon its objectives in relation to protection of the environment, in so far as it relates to the protection of animals and plants (biota) in their natural environment, and how these can be met by the use of Reference Animals and Plants (RAPs); their Derived Consideration Reference Levels (DCRLs), which relate radiation effects to doses over and above their normal local background natural radiation levels; and different potential pathways of exposure. The report explains the different types of exposure situations to which its recommendations apply; the key principles that are relevant to protection of the environment; and hence how reference values based on the use of DCRLs can be used to inform on the appropriate level of effort relevant to different exposure situations. Further recommendations are made with regard to how the Commission's recommendations can be implemented to satisfy different forms of environmental protection objectives, which may require the use of representative organisms specific to a site, and how these may be compared with the reference values. Additional information is also given with regard to, in particular, communication with other interested parties and stakeholders. Issues that may arise in relation to compliance are also discussed, and the final chapter discusses the overall implications of the Commission's work in this area to date. Appendices A and B provide some numerical information relating to the RAPs. Annex C considers various existing types of environmental protection legislation currently in place in relation to large industrial sites and practices, and the various ways in which wildlife are protected from various threats arising from such sites.

ICRP PUBLICATION 122: radiological protection in geological disposal of long-lived solid radioactive waste.

This report updates and consolidates previous recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) related to solid waste disposal (ICRP, 1985, 1997b, 1998). The recommendations given apply specifically to geological disposal of long-lived solid radioactive waste. The report explains how the ICRP system of radiological protection described in Publication 103 (ICRP, 2007) can be applied in the context of the geological disposal of long-lived solid radioactive waste. Although the report is written as a standalone document, previous ICRP recommendations not dealt with in depth in the report are still valid. The 2007 ICRP system of radiological protection evolves from the previous process-based protection approach relying on the distinction between practices and interventions by moving to an approach based on the distinction between three types of exposure situation: planned, emergency and existing. The Recommendations maintains the Commission's three fundamental principles of radiological protection namely: justification, optimisation of protection and the application of dose limits. They also maintain the current individual dose limits for effective dose and equivalent dose from all regulated sources in planned exposure situations. They re-enforce the principle of optimisation of radiological protection, which applies in a similar way to all exposure situations, subject to restrictions on individual doses: constraints for planned exposure situations, and reference levels for emergency and existing exposure situations. The Recommendations also include an approach for developing a framework to demonstrate radiological protection of the environment. This report describes the different stages in the life time of a geological disposal facility, and addresses the application of relevant radiological protection principles for each stage depending on the various exposure situations that can be encountered. In particular, the crucial factor that influences the application of the protection system over the different phases in the life time of a disposal facility is the level of oversight or 'watchful care' that is present. The level of oversight affects the capability to control the source, i.e. the waste and the repository, and to avoid or reduce potential exposures. Three main time frames are considered: time of direct oversight, when the disposal facility is being implemented and is under active supervision; time of indirect oversight, when the disposal facility is sealed and oversight is being exercised by regulators or special administrative bodies or society at large to provide additional assurance on behalf of society; and time of no oversight, when oversight is no longer exercised in case memory of the disposal facility is lost.

Biological basis for protection of the environment.

The approach to protection of the environment may vary considerably depending on ethical basis, methodological approach, and identification of endpoints and protective targets. The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) reviewed these issues in Publication 91, 'A framework for assessing the impact of ionising radiation on non-human species', published in 2003. At the same time, ICRP proposed that a possible future ICRP system addressing environmental assessment and protection would focus on biota, that the system should be effect-based so that any reasoning about adequate protection would be derived from firm understanding of harm at different exposure levels, and that the system should be based on data sets for Reference Animals and Plants. ICRP has thus chosen to approach environmental protection on the basis of biology, and further developed the approach in Publications 103, 108 and 114. This paper explores the biological basis for the ICRP system of environmental protection from the viewpoints of: the effects endpoints of concern; the hierarchy of biological organisation; adequate and appropriate protective targets; and the derivation of benchmark dose (rates) to guide protective efforts.

Issues and practices in the use of effects data from FREDERICA in the ERICA Integrated Approach.

The ERICA Integrated Approach requires that a risk assessment screening dose rate is defined for the risk characterisation within Tiers 1 and 2. At Tier 3, no numerical screening dose rate is used, and the risk characterisation is driven by methods that can evaluate the possible effects of ionising radiation on reproduction, mortality and morbidity. Species sensitivity distribution has been used to derive the ERICA risk assessment predicted no-effect dose rate (PNEDR). The method used was based on the mathematical processing of data from FRED (FASSET radiation effects database merged with the EPIC database to form FREDERICA) and resulted in a PNEDR of 10 microGy/h. This rate was assumed to ascribe sufficient protection of all ecosystems from detrimental effects on structure and function under chronic exposure. The value was weighed against a number of points of comparison: (i) PNEDR values obtained by application of the safety factor method, (ii) background levels, (iii) dose rates triggering effects on radioactively contaminated sites and (iv) former guidelines from literature reviews. In Tier 3, the effects analysis must be driven by the problem formulation and is thus highly case specific. Instead of specific recommendations on numeric values, guidance on the sorts of methods that may be applied for refined effect analysis is provided and illustrated.

The FASSET framework for assessment of environmental impact of ionising radiation in European ecosystems--an overview.

The FASSET project was launched in November 2000 under the EC 5th Framework Programme to develop a framework for the assessment of environmental impact of ionising radiation in European ecosystems. It involved 15 organisations in seven European countries and delivered its final report in spring 2004. The project set out to organise radioecological and radiobiological data into a logical structure that would facilitate the assessment of likely effects on non-human biota resulting from known or postulated depositions of radionuclides in the environment. The project included an overview of 20 pathway-based environmental assessment systems targeted at radioactive substances, or at hazardous substances in general. The resulting framework includes the following fundamental elements: source characterisation; description of seven major European ecosystems; selection of a number of reference organisms on the basis of prior ecosystem and exposure analysis; environmental transfer analysis; dosimetric considerations; effects analysis; and general guidance on interpretation including consideration of uncertainties. The project has used existing information supplemented with development in some areas, e.g. Monte Carlo calculations to derive dose conversion coefficients, model development, and the building of an effects database (FRED, the FASSET Radiation Effects Database). On the basis of experience from FASSET and other recent programmes, it can be concluded that (i) there is substantial agreement in terms of conceptual approaches between different frameworks currently in use or proposed, (ii) differences in technical approaches can be largely attributed to differences in ecosystems of concern or in national regulatory requirements, (iii) sufficient knowledge is available to scientifically justify assessments following the Framework structure, but (iv) significant data gaps exist for environmental transfer of key nuclides as well as for effects data for key wildlife groups at environmentally relevant dose rates. This paper briefly describes the overall content of the FASSET Framework, as well as highlighting a few important future challenges.

Plant nutrition, dry matter gain and partitioning at the whole-plant level.

Differential flows of photoassimilate result in patterns of dry matter distribution among plant organs. The extent to which these patterns are dependent on the flux of different mineral nutrients entering the root and the extent to which the distribution of dry matter in the whole plant is affected by differentials in nutrient (primarily nitrate) flux among parts of the root system is considered. It is concluded that patterns of dry matter distribution and nutritional status may depend on how nutrient supply has been manipulated about the root. Where the flux density of nutrient has been decreased and has become limiting to plant growth, two categories of response have been observed. In the case of N, P or S, limiting flux density results in a proportionately greater amount of plant dry matter in roots than is found at higher flux densities. This contrasts with the case of limiting K, Mg or Mn supply, where proportionately less plant dry matter is found in roots at lower nutrient flux densities than at higher flux densities. In the case of N, particular attention is paid as to how sink strength may be related to differences between root and leaf cells in their capacity for loosening and synthesis processes in the primary cell wall.

Nitrate-regulated growth and cytokinin responses in seminal roots of barley.

The influence of nitrate availability on growth of seminal roots, and root cytokinin levels, was studied in barley (Hordeum vulgare L. cv Golf). Nitrate was continuously supplied to initially N-starved seedlings at relative addition rates (RA) of 0.03 to 0.21 per day (standard cultures) or at RA 0.09 per day in split root cultures with the nitrate additions distributed in ratios of 100:0 or 80:20 to the two subroots. Data were collected both during a phase of acclimation (first 10 days of N additions) and in the acclimated stage (>10 days after onset of N additions). Limitation of whole-plant growth was observed at RA <0.15 per day. The lateral root frequency increased with RA in plants of equal chronological age. However, the lateral root frequency was related to root size rather than to RA; roots of uneven age but having comparable total root lengths also had comparable lateral root frequencies. Growth of individual subroots in split root systems during acclimation was proportional to the fraction of the total N addition that was fed to the root. All subroots had comparable relative growth rates in acclimated plants, and their lateral root frequency correlated with total root length in the same manner as in standard cultures. Onset of N additions in a 80:20 split root culture resulted in doublings of zeatin riboside (ZR) levels in shoots and in the "80" root, whereas the response of the "20" root was small. No effect of perturbed nitrate availability on xylem translocation of ZR was observed. The ZR levels remained higher in the "80" root during acclimation but returned to the level of the "20" root after acclimation. Root cytokinin levels and xylem translocation in acclimated standard cultures were unaffected by RA in the lower range but increased at high RA. Arguments for involvement of cytokinins in the nitrate-regulated growth response are discussed.

Nitrogen Utilization in Lemna: II. Studies of Nitrate Uptake Using NO(3).

(13)N-labeled nitrate was used to trace short-term nitrate influx into Lemna gibba L. G3 in experiments where disappearance of both radioactivity and total nitrate from the incubation medium was measured continuously and simultaneously. In plants performing net nitrate uptake from an initial nitrate concentration of 40 to 60 micromolar, there was no discrepancy between net uptake and influx, irrespective of the N status of the plants, indicating that concomitant nitrate efflux was low or nil. Plants treated with tungstate to inactivate nitrate reductase were able to take up nitrate following induction of the uptake system by exposure to a low amount of nitrate. Also, in this case, net uptake was equivalent to influx. In tungstate-treated plants preloaded with nitrate, both net uptake and influx were nil. In contrast to these observations, a clear discrepancy between net uptake and influx was observed when the plants were incubated at an initial nitrate concentration of approximately 5 micromolar, where net uptake is low and eventually ceases. It is concluded that plasmalemma nitrate transport is essentially unidirectional in plants performing net uptake at a concentration of 40 to 60 micromolar, and that transport is nil when internal nitrate sinks (vacuole, metabolism) are eliminated. The efflux component becomes increasingly important when the external concentration approaches the threshold value for net nitrate uptake (the nitrate compensation point) where considerable exchange between internal and external nitrate occurs.

Nitrogen Utilization in Lemna: III. Short-Term Effects of Ammonium on Nitrate Uptake and Nitrate Reduction.

The effects of ammonium application on nitrate utilization were studied in N-limited cultures of Lemna gibba L. G3. Addition of ammonium instantaneously inhibited net nitrate uptake by at least 60%, followed by a slight recovery. The inhibition was equally clear after near-complete inactivation of glutamine synthetase by application of l-methionine-d,l-sulfoximine. Experiments where (13)N-labeled nitrate was used as an influx tracer revealed that ammonium specifically inhibited influx, but did not promote nitrate efflux. Nitrate accumulation was relatively more inhibited than nitrate reduction and net uptake. Nitrate reductase, extracted and assayed in vitro in the presence of the thiol proteinase inhibitor leupeptin, was unaffected by short-term treatment of the plants with either nitrate, ammonium, or ammonium nitrate. Nitrate reductase activity recovered in the absence of leupeptin was considerably lower; however, it was enhanced by all the nitrogen sources, with ammonium as the most potent. It is argued that the effect of ammonium on nitrate utilization in Lemna is due to inhibition of nitrate influx, and that the effect should be attributed to ammonium itself, not to a newly formed nitrogen derivative. The decreased nitrate flux caused a decrease in nitrate reduction, whereas the activity of nitrate reductase per se rather is stabilized by presence of ammonium.

Short-term studies of NO 3 (-) uptake in Pisum using (13)NO 3 (-).

Influx, efflux and net uptake of NO 3 (-) was studied in Pisum sativum L. cv. Marma in short-term experiments where (13)NO 3 (-) was used to trace influx. The influx rate in N-limited plants was similar both during net uptake at external concentrations of around 50 µM, and at low external NO 3 (-) concentrations (4-6 µM) when net uptake was practically zero. Efflux could be inferred from discrepancies between influx and net uptake but was never very high in the N-limited plants during net uptake. Close to the threshold concentration for not NO 3 (-) uptake, efflux was high and equalled influx. Thus, the threshold concentration can be regarded as a NO 3 (-) compensation point. The inclusion of NH 4 (+) in the outer medium decreased influx by about 40% but did not significantly affect efflux. The roles of NO 3 (-) fluxes and nitrate-reductase activity in regulating/limiting NO 3 (-) utilization are discussed.

Distribution of reducing power between photosynthetic carbon and nitrogen assimilation in Scenedesmus.

Fixation of CO2 and N assimilation were studied in synchronous cultures of Scenedesmus obtusiusculus Chod. under saturating and limiting light. Within the photon-flux range studied, the cells maintained C to N assimilation ratios of 7-10 with either NO 3 (-) , NO 2 (+) or NH 4 (+) as the N source. Competitive interactions between C and N assimilation were pronounced under light limitation and were proportional to the oxidation status of the N source. Fixation of CO2 at saturating light was also slightly reduced by NO 2 (-) and NH 4 (+) . In the absence of CO2, NO 3 (-) uptake and reduction was light-saturated at a comparatively low photon flux, whereas NO 2 (-) uptake and reduction was considerably faster in the absence of CO2 than in its presence. The pools of reduced pyridine nucleotides (NADPH and NADH) were largely unaffected by the presence or absence of the different N sources. The regulatory influences of CO2 fixation on N assimilation are discussed in terms of coupling between the rates of CO2 fixation and NH 4 (+) assimilation, as well as the existance of control mechanisms for NO 3 (-) uptake and reduction.

Regulation by amino acids of photorespiratory ammonia and glycolate release from ankistrodesmus in the presence of methionine sulfoximine.

Methionine sulfoximine induced release of ammonia from illuminated cells of Ankistrodesmus braunii (Naegeli) Brunnth, in normal air, but less in air enriched to 3% CO(2). In normal air, methionine sulfoximine also induced glycolate release. Addition of either glutamate, glycine, or serine suppressed glycolate release, whereas glutamate and glycine at the same time stimulated ammonia release. The results indicate that inhibition of glutamine synthetase and thereby inhibition of photorespiratory nitrogen cycling restricts the sink capacity for glycolate in the photorespiratory carbon cycle. An external supply of glutamate, glycine, or serine seems to stimulate glyoxylate transamination and thus partly restores the sink capacity. Calculations of total glycolate formation rates in air from glycolate and ammonia release rates in the presence of methionine sulfoximine and glutamate revealed values of approximately 20 micromoles glycolate per milligram chlorophyll per hour on the average. Similar calculations led to an estimated rate of photorespiratory ammonia release in air, in the absence of methionine sulfoximine, of about 10 micromoles per milligram chlorophyll per hour on the average, a value comparable to the primary nitrogen assimilation rate of 8 micromoles per milligram chlorophyll per hour.